Resnick Law, P.C.

1 (888) 724-4071

Free Phone Consultation

Call: (248) 642-5400

Menu
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorneys
      • H. Nathan Resnick
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Views & News
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Close
  • Our Clients
    • Who We Represent
    • Results
    • Testimonials
    • Close
  • Practice Areas
      • Appeals
      • Asset Protection
      • Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
        • Garnishment
        • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
      • Business Law
      • Construction Law
      • Contracts
      • Corporate Litigation
      • Creditor Rights
      • Debt Relief Laws
      • Estate Planning
      • Foreclosure
      • Guardianship & Conservatorship
      • Liability of Electronic Communications
      • Property Tax Appeals
      • Real Estate & Zoning
      • Receivership
      • Short Sales
      • Trust & Probate Administration
    • Close
  • FAQ
    • Michigan Bankruptcy Laws
      • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Estate & Probate
      • Estate Planning Basics
      • Will and Trusts
      • Death and Taxes
      • Probate Law Questions
      • Other Assets and Tools
      • Changing Your Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • What is a Garnishment?
    • Close
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Close
  • Contact
    • Close

Debt Settlement Could be Worse than Bankruptcy Due To Tax Hit

December 12, 2012

Most of our clients in financial distress strive to avoid the filing of bankruptcy out of the shame that they feel.  Because the client does not want to file for bankruptcy, we are often approached about settling debts instead.

While we certainly applaud the desire of clients to attempt to repay their creditors and settle their obligations, and while there may be reasons that a person would actually be better off settling debts rather than filing for bankruptcy (the client has too many assets), the simple fact is that a client may put themselves in a considerably worse financial hole due to the potential tax consequences of forgiven debt.

Under the federal Internal Revenue Code, when a debt you owe is forgiven, the amount of the debt that is forgiven is generally considered income to the person and it must be included on their tax returns as ordinary income.  We call this “cancellation of debt” (COD) income.

However, while the general rule is that you include COD income, there are two very important “exclusions” – (1) where you are insolvent, and (2) where you filed for bankruptcy.

The easiest exclusion to consider is if the debt was “forgiven” because of a discharge in bankruptcy.  If a debt is discharged in bankruptcy, any resulting COD income is excluded in full.  Bankruptcy wouldn’t be very beneficial if, in forgiving your debt, you were suddenly faced with a huge tax bill because you had to include all the forgiven debt as income on your tax return – Ouch!

The other major exclusion is the “insolvency” exception.  In general, if your debts exceed your assets, you are insolvent.  You can exclude an amount of COD income to the extent that you are insolvent.   For example, if you have $200,000 in debts, and $175,000 in assets, you are insolvent to the extent of $25,000 – that is how much your liabilities exceed your assets.  But let us say you just negotiated a debt settlement that resulted in forgiven debt of $40,000.  Since you are only insolvent by $25,000 then you can only exclude $25,000 of the resulting $40,000 in COD income, meaning you will have to pay taxes on the $15,000 of COD income that you couldn’t exclude.

The obvious difference is that while the bankruptcy exception excludes COD income in full, the insolvency exception may exclude it in full (depending on how the insolvency numbers work out), but it may not as well.

If the client is not insolvent at all, then none of the COD income is excluded and the client faces a large potential tax bill (which is generally not dischargeable for at least 3 years).

For clients who have assets, the question then becomes whether those assets can be protected in bankruptcy from the reach of creditors so that all the debt can be forgiven with no immediate tax consequence.   If assets cannot be excluded, then one must consider which alternative (debt settlement vs. bankruptcy) will result in the least amount of loss based on assets and the amount of tax that may have to be paid.  It may be that one still comes out financially better in bankruptcy even though some assets may be lost to a bankruptcy trustee in the process.

Deciding whether to settle debts or whether bankruptcy is the right answer is a complex issue.  Settling debt can avoid bankruptcy – but the cost may be a huge, nondischargeable tax bill instead.  Potential clients should not assume that settling debt is always the best route and that it may result in even bigger problems if the taxman cannot be paid.

Filed Under: Michigan Bankruptcy

Have Questions? Need Legal Guidance?

Have your case reviewed by a Resnick Law attorney today!

Get Started Now

Do You Have a Claim?

Call (248) 642-5400

Free Phone Consultations
Same Day Response

Practice Areas

Our Firm Is Your Solution For:

  • Asset Protection
  • Bankruptcy
  • Business Law
  • Testimonials
  • Appeals
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Corporate and Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor Rights
  • Debt Relief Laws
  • Estate Planning
  • Foreclosure
  • Guardianship & Conservatorship
  • Liability of Electronic Communications
  • Property Tax Appeals
  • Real Estate & Zoning
  • Receivership
  • Short Sales
  • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
  • Trust & Probate Administration

Office Locations

  • Bloomfield Hills – (248) 642-5400
    40900 Woodward Avenue, #111
    Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Stay in touch

Sign up to get interesting news and updates delivered to your inbox.

Our firm’s practice areas include:

  • Appeals
  • Asset Protection
  • Bankruptcy
  • Business Law
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Corporate & Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor Rights
  • Debt Relief Laws
  • Estate Planning
  • Foreclosure
  • Guardianship & Conservatorship
  • Liability of Electronics
  • Property Tax Appeals

 

  • Real Estate & Zoning
  • Receivership
  • Short Sales
  • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
  • Trust & Probate Administration

 

Martindale-Hubbell
dbusiness
Resnick Law Peer Review Rated

Recent Posts

  • Struggling With Tax Debt in Michigan? Your Guide to the IRS Fresh Start Program
  • Successfully Addressing Diversity in a Post-Pandemic Workplace
  • ESG Disclosure Simplification Act Passed by House
  • Business Debt and Partnerships: What You Need to Know to Protect Yourself
  • Mergers and Acquisitions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Office Locations

  • Bloomfield Hills – (248) 642-5400
    40900 Woodward Avenue, #111
    Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Get Help Now

Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Resnick Law, P.C. All rights reserved · Disclaimer · Privacy Policy

Attorneys at Resnick Law, P.C. serve clients in Bloomfield Hills, Metro Detroit, the Tri-County Area and throughout southeast Michigan, including: Oakland County, Wayne County, Macomb County, Livingston County, Genesee County, Washtenaw County, Lapeer County, St. Clair County, Birmingham, Rochester Hills, Rochester, West Bloomfield, Bloomfield Township, Novi, Royal Oak, St. Clair Shores, Grosse Pointe, Walled Lake, Ferndale, Berkley, Sterling Heights, Clarkston, Farmington Hills, Ann Arbor, Howell, Brighton, Mount Clemens, Flint, Grand Blanc, Livonia, Dearborn, Troy, Plymouth, Pontiac, Northville, Southfield, Warren and Utica.

All materials and content in this Blog are provided for informational purposes only. Information contained in this Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with Resnick Law, P.C. and any recipient of this Blog. The contents of this Blog, in whole and in part, are not to be construed as a legal opinion or legal advice. All materials and content in this Blog are provided for informational purposes only. Persons viewing information contained in this Blog should not act upon such information without first seeking appropriate and specific legal or professional consultation. Please contact an attorney at our office to obtain legal advice specific to your needs.

Viewing of this website does not create an attorney/client relationship with Resnick Law, P.C. All materials and content on this website are provided for informational purposes only. These informational materials are not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such, because each person’s legal matters are unique and results will vary. The contents of this website do not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, settlements or specific client endorsements. Persons viewing information contained in this website should not act upon such information without first seeking appropriate and specific legal or professional advice. Please contact an attorney at our office to obtain legal advice specific to your needs.