Resnick Law, P.C.

1 (888) 724-4071

Free Phone Consultation

Call: (248) 642-5400

Menu
  • Home
  • Our Firm
    • Firm Overview
    • Attorneys
      • H. Nathan Resnick
    • Attorney Referrals
    • Views & News
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Close
  • Our Clients
    • Who We Represent
    • Results
    • Testimonials
    • Close
  • Practice Areas
      • Appeals
      • Asset Protection
      • Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
        • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
        • Garnishment
        • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
      • Business Law
      • Construction Law
      • Contracts
      • Corporate Litigation
      • Creditor Rights
      • Debt Relief Laws
      • Estate Planning
      • Foreclosure
      • Guardianship & Conservatorship
      • Liability of Electronic Communications
      • Property Tax Appeals
      • Real Estate & Zoning
      • Receivership
      • Short Sales
      • Trust & Probate Administration
    • Close
  • FAQ
    • Michigan Bankruptcy Laws
      • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
      • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
    • Estate & Probate
      • Estate Planning Basics
      • Will and Trusts
      • Death and Taxes
      • Probate Law Questions
      • Other Assets and Tools
      • Changing Your Wills, Estates & Trusts
    • What is a Garnishment?
    • Close
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Close
  • Contact
    • Close

Debtors Do Not Act in Bad Faith in Excluding Social Security Income

December 3, 2012

Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code allows individual debtors with regular income to reorganize their debts by catching up on mortgage arrearages, potentially stripping off 2nd and 3rd mortgages on their homes, restructuring payments on vehicles, and discharging a broader array of debts than can be discharged in a Chapter 7 filing. A Chapter 13 filer makes payments to a Chapter 13 Trustee who then makes payments to creditors based on the plan proposed by the Debtor.

Because the Chapter 13 plan payments are based on the individual or married couple’s “projected disposable income,” the major stumbling block for many debtors who file for Chapter 13 protection is living within a no-frills budget that allows the debtor to meet his payment obligations.

In short, the debtor’s “disposable income” is basically whatever income you might receive minus your reasonable and necessary expenses.   However, in 2005, when Congress amended the bankruptcy laws, they defined a person’s “current monthly income” in such a way that it “excludes benefits received under the Social Security Act.”   For Chapter 13 purposes, a person’s disposable income is defined in reference to their “current monthly income.”  Thus, under a straightforward reading of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor should be allowed to exclude any Social Security benefits in calculating their Chapter 13 plan payment – an obvious benefit to a debtor as it allows the debtor to keep such benefits without having to turnover any portion of the funds to creditors.

However, Chapter 13 bankruptcy trustees were arguing that it was, nonetheless, “bad faith” for a person to exclude Social Security income when calculating their plan payments.  For debtors, the issue then became whether they are acting in good faith when they did something that the Bankruptcy Code expressly allows.

For Michigan residents, the Sixth Circuit, in the case of Baud v. Carroll (link), has held that a Chapter 13 debtor’s projected disposable income does not include Social Security benefits, but did not have the chance to consider the issue of whether a debtor acts in “good faith” by excluding the benefits.

Other recent Circuit Court decisions have stepped in and answered the “good faith” question and have found that a debtor does not act in “bad faith” when the Debtor does what the Bankruptcy Code specifically allows.

The Tenth Circuit has recently decided the case of In re Cranmer (link).  In that case the court found that a debtor was not acting in bad faith by not including Social Security income when calculating plan payments.

Less than one week later, the Fifth Circuit came to the same conclusion in the case of In re Ragos (link).

These recent decisions are of tremendous benefit to Chapter 13 filers and will allow some debtors to keep more of their income during the course of their Chapter 13 plans – helping to ensure that Debtors will have adequate income to meet their needs and the emergencies that arise.  Chapter 13 filers are more likely to make their plan payments when they have adequate resources to take care of their necessities.

Filed Under: Michigan Bankruptcy

Have Questions? Need Legal Guidance?

Have your case reviewed by a Resnick Law attorney today!

Get Started Now

Do You Have a Claim?

Call (248) 642-5400

Free Phone Consultations
Same Day Response

Practice Areas

Our Firm Is Your Solution For:

  • Asset Protection
  • Bankruptcy
  • Business Law
  • Testimonials
  • Appeals
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Corporate and Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor Rights
  • Debt Relief Laws
  • Estate Planning
  • Foreclosure
  • Guardianship & Conservatorship
  • Liability of Electronic Communications
  • Property Tax Appeals
  • Real Estate & Zoning
  • Receivership
  • Short Sales
  • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
  • Trust & Probate Administration

Office Locations

  • Bloomfield Hills – (248) 642-5400
    40900 Woodward Avenue, #111
    Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Stay in touch

Sign up to get interesting news and updates delivered to your inbox.

Our firm’s practice areas include:

  • Appeals
  • Asset Protection
  • Bankruptcy
  • Business Law
  • Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
  • Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
  • Construction Law
  • Contracts
  • Corporate & Commercial Litigation
  • Creditor Rights
  • Debt Relief Laws
  • Estate Planning
  • Foreclosure
  • Guardianship & Conservatorship
  • Liability of Electronics
  • Property Tax Appeals

 

  • Real Estate & Zoning
  • Receivership
  • Short Sales
  • Solutions Without Bankruptcy®
  • Trust & Probate Administration

 

Martindale-Hubbell
dbusiness
Resnick Law Peer Review Rated

Recent Posts

  • Struggling With Tax Debt in Michigan? Your Guide to the IRS Fresh Start Program
  • Successfully Addressing Diversity in a Post-Pandemic Workplace
  • ESG Disclosure Simplification Act Passed by House
  • Business Debt and Partnerships: What You Need to Know to Protect Yourself
  • Mergers and Acquisitions During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Office Locations

  • Bloomfield Hills – (248) 642-5400
    40900 Woodward Avenue, #111
    Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304

Connect With Us

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Get Help Now

Contact Us

Copyright © 2023 Resnick Law, P.C. All rights reserved · Disclaimer · Privacy Policy

Attorneys at Resnick Law, P.C. serve clients in Bloomfield Hills, Metro Detroit, the Tri-County Area and throughout southeast Michigan, including: Oakland County, Wayne County, Macomb County, Livingston County, Genesee County, Washtenaw County, Lapeer County, St. Clair County, Birmingham, Rochester Hills, Rochester, West Bloomfield, Bloomfield Township, Novi, Royal Oak, St. Clair Shores, Grosse Pointe, Walled Lake, Ferndale, Berkley, Sterling Heights, Clarkston, Farmington Hills, Ann Arbor, Howell, Brighton, Mount Clemens, Flint, Grand Blanc, Livonia, Dearborn, Troy, Plymouth, Pontiac, Northville, Southfield, Warren and Utica.

All materials and content in this Blog are provided for informational purposes only. Information contained in this Blog does not create an attorney-client relationship with Resnick Law, P.C. and any recipient of this Blog. The contents of this Blog, in whole and in part, are not to be construed as a legal opinion or legal advice. All materials and content in this Blog are provided for informational purposes only. Persons viewing information contained in this Blog should not act upon such information without first seeking appropriate and specific legal or professional consultation. Please contact an attorney at our office to obtain legal advice specific to your needs.

Viewing of this website does not create an attorney/client relationship with Resnick Law, P.C. All materials and content on this website are provided for informational purposes only. These informational materials are not intended to constitute legal advice and should not be construed as such, because each person’s legal matters are unique and results will vary. The contents of this website do not reflect current legal developments, verdicts, settlements or specific client endorsements. Persons viewing information contained in this website should not act upon such information without first seeking appropriate and specific legal or professional advice. Please contact an attorney at our office to obtain legal advice specific to your needs.